2005 CHRYSLER PACIFICA
2 Average Rating
- 3 Interior
- 3 Exterior
- 3 Performance
- 1 Reliability
- 1 Value
Specs and features
VIN: | 2C4GM68445R651173 |
Year: | 2005 |
Make: | Chrysler |
Model: | Pacifica |
Body: | SPORT UTILITY 4-DR |
Trim: | Touring FWD |
Age: | 19 |
Engine: | 3.5L V6 SOHC 24V |
Drivetrain: | front-wheel drive |
Highway MPG: | 23 miles/gallon |
City MPG: | 17 miles/gallon |
Manufactured In: | CANADA |
Active Recalls: | No Reported Data Found |
Fuel Economy
17 miles/gallon
23 miles/gallon
Customer reviews
Read what other owners think about the Used 2005 CHRYSLER PACIFICA
-
5 star
-
4 star
-
3 star
-
2 star
-
1 star
Reviews
-
(2)
Ready to be junked
Aug 02, 2023
Not much to say accept Chrysler did not engineer this car properly, most vital parts like the transmission and electrical system have endless faults that are unfixable. The reason is when you replace a bad part with a new good part that new good part is engineered the same way as the part that went bad and it is bound to go bad, you are just buying a little bit of time. Just as an example: I am on my third transmission and it is going out now as well. Needless to say this is a ticking time bomb and I am done with it and I do not suggest anyone buying a Pacifica. You want to waste your money go to Vegas gambling, at least you will have some enjoyment out of that.
Ready to be junked
Aug 02, 2023Not much to say accept Chrysler did not engineer this car properly, most vital parts like the transmission and electrical system have endless faults that are unfixable. The reason is when you replace a bad part with a new good part that new good part is engineered the same way as the part that went bad and it is bound to go bad, you are just buying a little bit of time. Just as an example: I am on my third transmission and it is going out now as well. Needless to say this is a ticking time bomb and I am done with it and I do not suggest anyone buying a Pacifica. You want to waste your money go to Vegas gambling, at least you will have some enjoyment out of that.
Please kindly note: